When Jorge Soler hit his first two home runs against Cincinnati, one thing was readily apparent: Soler was no longer over-torquing his back swing. He is big and strong enough to make a normal short stride swing to clear the fences.
This is in stark contrast to last season's call up where Soler (as well as Javy Baez, and then Starlin Castro falling into the habit) of overswinging to generate 16 inch softball hitter power.
Soler has made an adjustment, something hitting coach John Mallee tried with Baez.
Mallee, 45, begins his fifth season as a major league hitting coach, his
first with the Cubs. He previously served as a big league hitting coach
with the Marlins (2010-11) and Astros (2013-14). Overall, Mallee has 19
seasons of experience in pro baseball. Prior to moving to the big
leagues, he spent eight-plus seasons as the Marlins minor league hitting
instructor. A Chicago native, Mallee also served as a minor league
hitting coach within the Brewers and Expos organizations starting in
1996. He spent two seasons as an infielder in the Phillies system from
1991-92.
In spring, Mallee was trying to get Baez to adjust his swing, especially during an at-bat. He wanted Baez to shorten his swing, "to allow him to stay in the hitting zone longer," as well as closing the huge holes in a long, loopy swing. Baez did make those adjustments in batting practice, but admitted that during games he would go back to his old ways. His old ways got him a surprising demotion to Iowa.
And maybe that demotion was a wake up call to the young players to listen to their coaches.
Joe Maddon has a very laid back approach to dealing with his players. He lets them prepare for games in their own ways and routines. He will only speak to them when he needs to speak to them. Maddon is more a funny uncle motivator than a hands-on teacher. He is trying to keep his team loose and relaxed even though the season started with a continuation of bad fundamentals and lack of plate discipline.
Confidence is something that has to be turned on inside a person's head. Success is the fuel for self-confidence. Being confident at the plate means a batter will get more pitches and then better pitches to hit.
If Mallee has converted Soler into a more standard hitting posture and mechanics, that bodes well for the team because Soler needs to be a confident and consistent presence in the middle of the order.
Showing posts with label HR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HR. Show all posts
April 16, 2015
March 21, 2015
THE WINDY QUESTION
An unreported story in regard to the New Wrigley Field is the affect the new signage and scoreboards will have on the wind patterns during games.
Prior to construction, it was clear that when the wind was blowing in (northerly), balls hit into the outfield were held up, pushed back and down. When the wind was blowing out to center (south-southwesterly), balls would carry especially in the power alley of LF.
I have not seen any published study about the effects of the new scoreboards will have at Wrigley. It is an important factor in considering on this team is being constructed (with young power hitters).
I am not an aerodynamic engineer, and I realize the the dimensions, angles, and variables in wind speeds can led to differential results, but using general urban wind patterns on structures, I postulated the following diagram:
One would think that if the wind was blowing into Wrigley, the large new scoreboards would "block" the prevailing wind and make it easier to hit homers in the power alleys. Except, the opposite is apparently true as the winds climb up the back of the structure then dive over the top to create a drag or low pressure area (like a air foil). Therefore, there may be actually more down force coming off the scoreboards than in a regular breeze.
Then, one would think that if the wind was blowing out of Wrigley, the large new scoreboards would have no effect on home runs. In the past, the center field scoreboard had little difference in air patterns blowing out since it is set back away from the 410 mark of the outfield wall. But from the air flow charts, air hitting a solid object will drop towards the ground. Since the new scoreboards are so close to the outfield walls, they could take the winds blowing out downward near the outfield wall (in effect increasing the distance for a home run to travel to clear the wall).
Now some may say that the space between the signs and scoreboards could create a canyon effect when the winds are blowing out of Wrigley (at some point increasing the air flow to the path of least resistance.) Whether that is true will have to been observed this year. Hitters could have to then thread a needle to find the super power alleys.
Besides affecting hitters, the down draft zones could cause problems with outfielders trying to judge hard hit fly balls. Even before the renovations, many players have publicly said that Wrigley Field outfield is a challenge to play due to the wind patterns and lack of safe foul territory. Adding another element of new wind circulation and down draft patterns could complicate defenses.
After writing this post, the Chicago Tribune posted a new graphic to help fans understand how "big" is the new jumbotron.
As I have said before, fans are going to be shocked at the size of the new scoreboards and the change in character of Wrigley Field.
Prior to construction, it was clear that when the wind was blowing in (northerly), balls hit into the outfield were held up, pushed back and down. When the wind was blowing out to center (south-southwesterly), balls would carry especially in the power alley of LF.
I have not seen any published study about the effects of the new scoreboards will have at Wrigley. It is an important factor in considering on this team is being constructed (with young power hitters).
I am not an aerodynamic engineer, and I realize the the dimensions, angles, and variables in wind speeds can led to differential results, but using general urban wind patterns on structures, I postulated the following diagram:
One would think that if the wind was blowing into Wrigley, the large new scoreboards would "block" the prevailing wind and make it easier to hit homers in the power alleys. Except, the opposite is apparently true as the winds climb up the back of the structure then dive over the top to create a drag or low pressure area (like a air foil). Therefore, there may be actually more down force coming off the scoreboards than in a regular breeze.
Then, one would think that if the wind was blowing out of Wrigley, the large new scoreboards would have no effect on home runs. In the past, the center field scoreboard had little difference in air patterns blowing out since it is set back away from the 410 mark of the outfield wall. But from the air flow charts, air hitting a solid object will drop towards the ground. Since the new scoreboards are so close to the outfield walls, they could take the winds blowing out downward near the outfield wall (in effect increasing the distance for a home run to travel to clear the wall).
Now some may say that the space between the signs and scoreboards could create a canyon effect when the winds are blowing out of Wrigley (at some point increasing the air flow to the path of least resistance.) Whether that is true will have to been observed this year. Hitters could have to then thread a needle to find the super power alleys.
Besides affecting hitters, the down draft zones could cause problems with outfielders trying to judge hard hit fly balls. Even before the renovations, many players have publicly said that Wrigley Field outfield is a challenge to play due to the wind patterns and lack of safe foul territory. Adding another element of new wind circulation and down draft patterns could complicate defenses.
After writing this post, the Chicago Tribune posted a new graphic to help fans understand how "big" is the new jumbotron.
As I have said before, fans are going to be shocked at the size of the new scoreboards and the change in character of Wrigley Field.
January 24, 2012
HOME RUN POWER
Now that the 2012 Cubs roster is pretty much set, there is a hue and cry about how bad the offense will be, especially in the deficiency of home run power. There are only two batters with a good probability of hitting 20 or more home runs this season: Soriano and LaHair. There are only two batters with a good probability of hitting 15 home runs: Soto and Castro.
How does a lack of a strong home run hitter impact on the Cubs overall record? Chicks did the long ball, but it is necessary in order to win?
From 1982 through 2011, the answer is a surprising no.
Year HR Leader Team HR HR Leader % Team Wins
1982 22 102 0.21568627451 73
1983 24 140 0.17142857143 71
1984 25 136 0.18382352941 96
1985 26 150 0.17333333333 77
1986 21 155 0.13548387097 70
1987 49 209 0.23444976077 76
1988 24 113 0.21238938053 77
1989 30 124 0.24193548387 93
1990 40 136 0.29411764706 77
1991 31 159 0.19496855346 77
1992 26 104 0.25 78
1993 33 161 0.2049689441 84
1994 25 109 0.22935779817 49
1995 36 158 0.22784810127 73
1996 40 175 0.22857142857 76
1997 36 127 0.28346456693 68
1998 66 212 0.31132075472 90
1999 63 189 0.33333333333 67
2000 50 183 0.27322404372 65
2001 64 194 0.32989690722 88
2002 49 200 0.245 67
2003 40 172 0.23255813953 88
2004 39 235 0.16595744681 89
2005 46 194 0.23711340206 79
2006 38 166 0.22891566265 66
2007 33 151 0.21854304636 85
2008 29 184 0.15760869565 97
2009 35 161 0.21739130435 83
2010 25 149 0.1677852349 75
2011 28 148 0.18918918919 71
1093 4796 0.22789824854
The lowest Team HR year was 1982 in this study. The Cubs won 73 games. The HR leader hit 21.57% of the team homers. One would assume that if you hit more home runs, you'd get more wins. The highest team HR year is 2004 with 235. The Cubs won 89 games, which is not the most during this time period. Four teams had more wins: 2008 (97 with 184 HR), 2004 (96 with 136 HR), 1989 (93 with 124 HR) and 1998 (90 with 212 HR). During the peak home run era (1998-2004), the Cubs averaged only 79 wins.
On average, the Cubs leading home run hitter hit 22.79% of the teams round trippers. Sammy Sosa's 33.33% average in 1999 was the highest in this period, but the Cubs only won 67 games that season. Even when the batting order was more "balanced," with the top home run leader was at only 13.55% of the team total in 1986, the Cubs won only 70 games.
So there is no statistical link between having a big home run hitter(s) in the line up and number of team victories.
How does a lack of a strong home run hitter impact on the Cubs overall record? Chicks did the long ball, but it is necessary in order to win?
From 1982 through 2011, the answer is a surprising no.
Year HR Leader Team HR HR Leader % Team Wins
1982 22 102 0.21568627451 73
1983 24 140 0.17142857143 71
1984 25 136 0.18382352941 96
1985 26 150 0.17333333333 77
1986 21 155 0.13548387097 70
1987 49 209 0.23444976077 76
1988 24 113 0.21238938053 77
1989 30 124 0.24193548387 93
1990 40 136 0.29411764706 77
1991 31 159 0.19496855346 77
1992 26 104 0.25 78
1993 33 161 0.2049689441 84
1994 25 109 0.22935779817 49
1995 36 158 0.22784810127 73
1996 40 175 0.22857142857 76
1997 36 127 0.28346456693 68
1998 66 212 0.31132075472 90
1999 63 189 0.33333333333 67
2000 50 183 0.27322404372 65
2001 64 194 0.32989690722 88
2002 49 200 0.245 67
2003 40 172 0.23255813953 88
2004 39 235 0.16595744681 89
2005 46 194 0.23711340206 79
2006 38 166 0.22891566265 66
2007 33 151 0.21854304636 85
2008 29 184 0.15760869565 97
2009 35 161 0.21739130435 83
2010 25 149 0.1677852349 75
2011 28 148 0.18918918919 71
1093 4796 0.22789824854
The lowest Team HR year was 1982 in this study. The Cubs won 73 games. The HR leader hit 21.57% of the team homers. One would assume that if you hit more home runs, you'd get more wins. The highest team HR year is 2004 with 235. The Cubs won 89 games, which is not the most during this time period. Four teams had more wins: 2008 (97 with 184 HR), 2004 (96 with 136 HR), 1989 (93 with 124 HR) and 1998 (90 with 212 HR). During the peak home run era (1998-2004), the Cubs averaged only 79 wins.
On average, the Cubs leading home run hitter hit 22.79% of the teams round trippers. Sammy Sosa's 33.33% average in 1999 was the highest in this period, but the Cubs only won 67 games that season. Even when the batting order was more "balanced," with the top home run leader was at only 13.55% of the team total in 1986, the Cubs won only 70 games.
So there is no statistical link between having a big home run hitter(s) in the line up and number of team victories.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

